FACT THAT NATURAL HEIRS ARE EXCLUDED, BY ITSELF, CANNOT BE HELD TO BE A SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCE ESPECIALLY WHEN THE BEQUEST IS MADE IN FAVOUR OF AN OFFSPRING

Delhi High Court in 2024:DHC:4812 titled ‘Deepak Duggal v State & Ors.’ held that the fact that natural heirs have either been excluded or a lesser share has been given to them, by itself without anything more, cannot be held to be a suspicious circumstance especially in a case where the bequest has been made in favour of an offspring.

The Court relied on Uma Devi Nambiar vs T.C. Sidhan, (2004) 2 SCC 321 wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that:

“16. A Will is executed to alter the ordinary mode of succession and by the very nature of things, it is bound to result in either reducing or depriving the share of natural heirs. If a person intends his property to pass to his natural heirs, there is no necessity at all of executing a Will. It is true that a propounder of the Will has to remove all suspicious circumstances. Suspicion means doubt, conjecture or mistrust. But the fact that natural heirs have either been excluded or a lesser share has been given to them, by itself without anything more, cannot be held to be a suspicious circumstance especially in a case where the bequest has been made in favour of an offspring. As held in P.P.K. Gopalan Nambiar v. P.P.K. Balakrishnan Nambiar, 1995 Supp (2) SCC 664; AIR 1972 SC 2492, it is the duty of the propounder of the Will to remove all the suspected features, but there must be real, germane and valid suspicious features and not fantasy of the doubting mind. It has been held that if the propounder succeeds in removing the suspicious circumstance, the court has to give effect to the Will, even if the Will might be unnatural in the sense that it has cut off wholly or in part near relations. (See Pushpavathi v. Chandraraja Kadamba, (1973) 3 SCC 291) In Rabindra Nath Mukherjee v. Panchanan Banerjee, (1995) 4 SCC 459, it was observed that the circumstance of deprivation of natural heirs should not raise any suspicion because the whole idea behind execution of the Will is to interfere with the normal line of succession and so, natural heirs would be debarred in every case of Will. Of course, it may be that in some cases they are fully debarred and, in some cases, partly.”

Scroll to Top